2 June 2011

First Thoughts: LinkedIn 'Apply' Button

Buttons seem to be very much in vogue at the moment, with both Google and Twitter recently joining the ubiquitous Facebook 'Like' button in popping up across the web. Not one to miss out on a good trend and recently buoyed by their mega-IPO, LinkedIn are set to join the buttonistas with their 'Apply With LinkedIn' button. Although not officially announced as of yet, details have emerged via GigaOM of the button which, according to a “source briefed on the feature”, is set to launch by the end of June.

The button is intended to be embedded in the jobs section of a companies website in order to streamline the recruitment process, effectively negating the need to upload a separate resume (traditionally a .doc / .pdf document). Aside from purely submitting their LinkedIn profile as a CV replacement, the hiring company can also ask a few additional questions, and the applicant is also presented with a few additional pieces of information such as connections who are affiliated with the company or additional similar job openings to which to apply.

Undoubtedly a good move for LinkedIn, as discussed by GigaOM; currently generating 43% of their revenue through their recruitment solutions, it makes sense in the decentralised state that the recruitment industry finds itself in that they move to ingrain themselves further in to the recruitment process. Another benefit to LinkedIn will be uplift in their own user base; if this does become the de-facto way to apply for jobs, then even those who try to avoid making any kind of social footprint on the web could persuaded to sign up.

The surface benefit for candidates is also clear; if this takes off, then a candidate will one-touch applications available to them across multiple job sites, customer websites and recruiter sites, cutting down on the time filling in cumbersome forms and uploading a CV. It also has the effect of putting your CV in the cloud, which has the practical effect of meaning you no longer need to use a USB Stick or Dropbox et al to apply for jobs if you are anywhere other than home, plus applying from mobile devices will be a more viable option.

And what does this mean to us as recruiters? After all the dust has settled, I don't think it will have too much of an impact on the industry. Agency side, at first glance, it looks like it takes a little more power away, and there is a lot of noise around social networking eliminating the need for recruitment agents at all; an overreacting certainly, and used properly this should prove to be another useful tool. I'm sure this will be adopted gleefully across the board by in-house recruitment teams; with this however comes the danger that you will be bombarded with even more applicants than you already receive, and with that a higher proportion of irrelevant / unqualified applicants, making the filtering process a longer and more arduous one. As a good agent will know, there is no better route in to a client than when they are wasting their own time shifting through a mountain of CVs; provide a solution to this and you're golden.

That said, I'm fully behind the move from LinkedIn; and I'm sure it will lend some weight to every cent of their $9.1billion worth.

29 May 2011

Who.Is as a Sourcing Tool

"WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information. The protocol stores and delivers database content in a human-readable format."

Or so says Wikipedia. As a technical recruiter we've already got such a throng of tools available to us; why would this be useful to us, and how is it even relevent? The WHOIS protocol, when manifested in websites such as who.is or whois.com, will (more often than not) allow you to get the e-mail address and phone number of the person who registered that domain. That is why it's relevent to us.

I used this as recently as last week to get hold of a contractor for a very specific Flash role I have been working on. I had found the candidate through a simple X-Ray search via Google on LinkedIn. No joy in adding him, or InMailing him.


A Google search brings up his portfolio, but there are very few other contact details, and he's done well to hide his e-mail address from any of the forums, boards and social networks he frequents.


Handily for us, his blog appears on his own domain, which allows us to use http://who.is/ to hopefully bring up those all important things; the contact details.


And there they are. :)

I'd also add as a side note; a more obvious solution could be to contact a potential candidate at their place of work, but a) that is not always possible (especially with contractors) and b) as a rule, I don't like doing it; only as a last resort. I've had several people react very badly to being contacted at work and given my business is built mainly around my relationships with candidates, it's an option I try to avoid.

-TW

27 May 2011

On The Source

An all too common scenario for any of us sourcing for technical or digital staff online; you've found an engineer with the perfect experience, they've been working for the right companies, have a good degree from the best Comp Sci University, live ten minutes walk from the office and played lacrosse in the same team as your hiring manager*.


* Ok, maybe the lacrosse is going a bit far, but you get the picture :)

They're not to be found on your internal database and their portfolio is bereft of any contact details other than a 'contact me' form to fill out. You've added them as a contact on LinkedIn and if you're lucky enough to have a LinkedIn Recruiter account you've sent them a couple of InMails, all of which have inevitably been siphoned off in to a dark, rarely checked corner of their e-mail by a myriad of spam filters designed specifically to stop recruiters and agents making their e-mail unusable.

You know if you can just get through, they'll be interested; the hard part, as most of us know, is that job boards and LinkedIn alike are so saturated with bad recruiters, that it makes the task for good recruiters much harder than merely finding the candidate in the first place.

I'm hoping through this blog, jumpled in with a load of other junk about London, cycling, football and other assorted grumblings, to share some of the ways in which I get around the problems facing a technical recruiter, and hopefully encourage some discussion around the various points contained herein.

-TW